If FSIS determines a discrepancy where the establishment tests the same lot negative for STEC but FSIS has a positive result, what is IPP's recommended course?

• A. Discuss the results with the establishment, issue an NR, verify corrective actions
• B. Discuss the discrepancy with establishment management and document an MOI
• C. Instruct the establishment to divert the affected lot of product for cooking
• D. Instruct the establishment to submit additional samples from the affected lot

Answer: (A)

When FSIS and the establishment show conflicting results for the same lot—establishment tests negative for STEC while FSIS has a positive result—the priority is to resolve the discrepancy through formal communication and documentation. The recommended course is to discuss the results with the establishment, issue a Noncompliance Report (NR), and verify corrective actions. This approach creates a clear record of the discrepancy, communicates the FSIS findings to the establishment, and requires the establishment to implement corrective actions. Verification then confirms that those actions are effective and prevent recurrence.

Diverting the product or instructing further cooking steps is a more drastic action that isn’t warranted solely by a discrepancy without first documenting the issue and obtaining and verifying corrective actions. Requiring additional samples may be part of some processes, but the formal NR and follow-up verification ensure a controlled, auditable resolution and accountability.